Monday, July 23, 2012

Economic Methodology



Assignment Paper on: Economic Methodology
Introduction
The economy is the basic element and wealth of the whole world. The whole world is in control of economy. The shape of today’s world is a result of the rise of the West and subsequent Europeanization of the globe. Europe became the center of a truly world political and economic system: political with its balance of powers and economic with its system of “World Economy”.
The basic economic fact in today’s world is that while minorities of the world’s people are growing richer, the majority are growing poorer. Economic justice is a concept in which the economic policies must result in distribution of benefits equally to all.
On the other hand, economical injustice and inequality are existing in the family, society and nations.  Scholastic philosophers addressed ethical questions concerning economic behavior, and they condemned ‘usury' -- that is, the taking of interest on money. Economic anthropology is the study of primitive and peasant economies wherever they exist in the world, in its broadest form encompasses economic and technological systems.  The economy has a vital role in Christian mission.
1.  Philosophical Reflection on Economic Methodology
Philosophical reflection on economics is ancient, but the conception of 'the economy' as a distinct object of study dates back only to the 18th century. Aristotle addresses some problems of economics mainly as problems of household management. Scholastic philosophers addressed ethical questions concerning economic behavior, and they condemned 'usury' -- that is, the taking of interest on money[1]
2.  Methodology of Economical Justice
Economic justice is a concept in which the economic policies must result in distribution of benefits equally to all. [2] Economic justice must touch both the individual and the social order.[3] Most economic institutions are designed upon the principle of economic justice.[4] Economic justice mainly aims at giving freedom to each person to engage creatively in unlimited work. [5]According to the principles of economic justice the jobs created by state and local tax incentives must go to local people and taxpayers without any discrimination.[6]
Modern economics springs from the search for a definition of economic justice, but has largely abandoned that search. Thus, 19th-century utilitarian economists, such as John Stuart Mill, spent much of their time searching for the principles that would lead to a condition of equity. But by the 1940’s, economists reluctantly came to the conclusion that there were no economic statements that could be made about equity. In this they were in agreement with moral philosophers and other social scientists that no ethical statements can be deduced from purely factual or purely logical statements-the only two kinds of statements to be found in modern economic theory. By the 1950’s questions of economic equity were not even discussed in the basic textbooks, except to note that it was necessary for a market economy to start with a “just” distribution of economic resources.[7]
2.1. Marxist Theory of Economic System
The Marxist theory of historical materialism understands society as fundamentally determined by the material conditions at any given time - this means the relationships which people enter into with one another in order to fulfill their basic needs, for instance to feed and clothe themselves and their families. In general Marx and Engels identified five successive stages of the development of these material conditions in Western Europe.[8]
The First Stage: is usually called Primitive[9] Communism. It has the following characteristics. 1) Shared property: there is no concept of ownership beyond individual possessions. All is shared by the tribe to ensure its survival. 2) Hunting and gathering: tribal societies have yet to develop large scale agriculture and so their survival is a daily struggle. 3) Proto-democracy: there is usually no concept of "leadership" yet. So tribes are led by the best warrior if there is war, the best diplomat if they have steady contact with other tribes and so forth.[10]
The Second Stage: may be called Slave Society,[11] considered to be the beginning of "class society" where private property appears. 1) Class: here the idea of class appears. There is always a slave-owning ruling class and the slaves themselves. 2) Statism: the state develops during this stage as a tool for the slave-owners to use and control the slaves. 3) Agriculture: people learn to cultivate plants and animals on a large enough scale to support large populations. 4) Democracy and Authoritarianism: these opposites develop at the same stage. Democracy arises first with the development of the republican city-state, followed by the totalitarian empire. 5) Private Property: citizens now own more than personal property. Land ownership is especially important during a time of agricultural development.[12]
The Third Stage: may be called Feudalism; during feudalism there are many classes such as kings, lords, and serfs, some little more than slaves. Most of these inherit their titles for good or ill. At the same time that societies must create all these new classes, trade with other nation-states increases rapidly. This catalyzes the creation of the merchant class. Out of the merchants' riches, a capitalist class emerges within this feudal society. However there are immediate conflicts with the aristocracy. The old feudal kings and lords cannot accept the new social changes the capitalists want for fear of destabilizing or reducing their power base, among various other reasons that are not all tied to power or money.[13]
The Fourth and Fifth: may be called as Capitalism and Socialism; that socialism would be the best means for developing a backward economy is of course not what Marx envisioned at all. Societies passed through stages of feudalism to capitalism to socialism; there was an historical necessity and inevitability to this process. This meant that the socialist revolution had to come first to the advanced capitalist countries.[14] The fact that it happened first in Russia caused great ideological consternation, but the theory soon adjusted to the new reality. And today in the advanced countries only dreamers imagine the possibility of revolution. Even the communist parties of Europe have gone the way of their social democrat predecessors in becoming “revisionist”.[15]
Capitalism is an economic cultural system, organized economically around the institution of property and the production of commodities and based culturally in the fact that exchanging relations.[16] Capitalism alone taps into modern beliefs about individuality and exploits what some would consider the baser human motives, greed and self-interest, to produce rising standards of living. When it comes to catering to the wants and desires of every individual, no matter how trivial those wants seem to others, no system does it even half so well.[17]
The world “socialism” in the Third World has all but lost any meaning, but as a minimum requirement it can mean today a system where the major productive facilities are owned and operated by the state and where there is comprehensive economic planning. This is, as contemporary history shows us, no guarantee for undoing underdevelopment, but it seems the one system capable of mobilizing resources for national development and holding enough monopoly power to withstand domination of the economy by foreigners.[18]
                                                                                             Economics deals with the allocation of limited resources,[19] material goods and human property and with the labor associated with producing, distributing, and maintaining them.[20] The Economic system is being basically feudal and individualistic and the improvement of the economic condition under this system being largely the responsibility of the individuals, places these poor people in a very unfair competition with the people that have power of tradition, culture, politics, Government and money. [21] Their lot remains unaltered, in spite of reservations for political representation. [22] Even this weapon is moulded to fit into the exploitative social and economic system of the country[23], thus rendering the political weapon blunt and useless.[24]
The disparity between rich and poor can be seen in every part of the world.[25] Despite all the effort, both scientific and applied, the poor continue to grow poorer and the hungry hungrier.[26] The wealth must be equally divided and distributed.[27] The poverty and other economical issues are also increasing because of economical injustice.[28]
The nations are developed, developing and underdeveloped.[29] “Development is a process, which enables human beings to realize their potential, build self confidence, and lead lives of dignity and fulfillment.[30] It is a process, which frees people from the fear of want and exploitation.[31] It is a movement away from political, economic, or social oppression.[32] It is clear that the declared purpose of development is aimed at the eradication of poverty, ignorance, and disease. [33] Most developing countries failed to see that such figures could conceal the poverty, suffering, and injustice that where the very ills they were eager to cure.[34]
It was the 19th century that shaped today’s world, divided between the developed and the under-developed. The world-view of this doctrine was that if the world economy were left alone it would produce prosperity for all.[35] All people have a right to participate in the economic life of society. [36]
4. The Methodology of Anthropologists Study of Economics
Anthropologists study the means by which goods are produced, distributed, and consumed in the context of the total culture of particular societies. Although they have borrowed theories and concepts from economists, many anthropologists feel that principles derived from the study of Western market economies are not applicable to economic systems where people do not produce and exchange goods for profit.[37] Economic anthropology is the study of primitive and peasant economies wherever they exist in the world. The study in its broadest form encompasses economic and technological systems.[38]
Economic systems involve the ways people, time, and materials are organized to produce, distribute (and redistribute), and consumer goods and services. [39] Such goods and services include the following:
1.  Food for the physical sustenance along with goods and services for religious, defense, and justice purposes; rites of passage; and other aspects of social and community life.
2.  Natural resources such as land, water, and minerals; human cooperation involved in the division of labor; and technology.
3.   Market places, foreign trade, monetary objects, devices for measuring and record keeping.[40]
5.   The Biblical Considerate of Economic Justice
Yahweh the God of Economic Justice[41], always takes side with the poor and the weak to do justice. Yahweh never tolerates injustice and that is why Yahweh many a time denounced Israel’s wrong doing.[42] Hosea 13: 5-6 explicitly states that even though Yahweh ‘care for you in the wilderness, in a land of drought, as if you were in the pasture,’ you ‘forgot Yahweh’ becoming ‘an oppressor trampling on justice, doggedly perusing what is worthless.’ Because Yahweh will not permit the triumph of evil, Israelites must be punished for their wrong doings.[43]
 The Society of Jesus day was highly stratified.[44] In such a context,[45] economic justice occupies a central place in his proclamation. He declares that the poor are blessed.[46] Jesus praxis entails establishing a new kind of solidarity[47] above and beyond class differences and other differences inherent in human life. Jesus seeks to defend the rights of all, especially the rights of the poor, the low, the sick and the alienated. Jesus opposes everything that divides human beings on the lines of envy, greed, calumny, oppression, hatred and so on.[48]
 
6. The Indian Economy
Almost half a century has passed since In­dia[49] gained its independence, but it has yet to join the ranks of the developed countries.[50] That is a dream still to be realized. And this is in spite of India being a large country with all kinds of potential resources of men and material.[51] The index of vulnerability measured in terms of social and economic inequality is threatening India’s economic stability. India has both the highest number agriculture and other economic resources. Predominantly agricultural with 64% of the labor force, but rapid industrialization and urbanization is taking place. India is now a nuclear power and has a space industry. It is one of the world leaders in computer software production. Economic growth accelerated in the 1990s but has been offset by high birth rate, illiteracy, prejudice, widespread corruption and bureaucratic inefficiency. The 250 million middle class would benefit most from the market reforms and liberalization being instituted. Over 600 million live in deep poverty, and 300 million live below the bread line. India’s widespread use of English gives the country a major advantage as its economy opens up to the world.[52]
Conclusion
Despite all the effort, both scientific and applied, the poor continue to grow poorer and the hungry hungrier. It was the 19th century that shaped today’s world, divided between the developed and the under-developed. “Development is a process, which enables human beings to realize their potential, build self confidence, and lead lives of dignity and fulfillment. Most developing countries failed to see that such figures could conceal the poverty, suffering, and injustice that where the very ills they were eager to cure. Marx and Engels identified five successive stages of the development of these material conditions in Western Europe such as, primitive communismslave society, feudalism, Capitalism and Socialism. The world-view of this doctrine was that if the world economy were left alone it would produce prosperity for all. All people have a right to participate in the economic life of society.
Yahweh the God of Economic Justice, always takes side with the poor and the weak to do justice. Yahweh never tolerates injustice and that is why Yahweh many a time denounced Israel’s wrong doing. Jesus opposes everything that divides human beings on the lines of envy, greed, calumny, oppression, hatred and so on. Paul envisions a community that is characterized by mutual sharing and solidarity.
India has both the highest number agriculture and other economic resources. The index of vulnerability measured in terms of social and economic inequality is threatening India’s economic stability.



Notes
[1] Daniel M. Hausman, "Economic Methodology" http://philosophy.wisc.edu/hausman/papers/enc-617.htm (accessed 01/ 07/ 2012).
[2] "What Is "Economic Justice"?"  http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles… (accessed 06/ 06/ 2012).
[3] "Economic Justice Law & Legal Definition ",  http://definitions.uslegal.com/e/economic-justice/ (accessed 06/ 06/ 2012).
[4] "My Take On "Economic Justice?"",  http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080730054004AA9MdE4 (accessed 06/ 06/ 2012).
[5] "Economic Justice",  http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/economic-justice.html#ixzz10IBXPquz (accessed 06/ 06/ 2012).
[6] "Economic Justice Law & Legal Definition ",   (accessed).
[7] Lester C. Thurow, "Toward a Definition of Economic Justice" http://www.nationalaffairs.com/public_interest/detail/toward-a-definition-of-economic-justice (accessed 06/ 06/ 2012).
[8] "Marx's Theory of World Economic",  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marx's_theory_of_history (accessed 01/ 07/ 2012).
[9] The primitive communism stage most likely begins soon after the dawn of humanity itself, at the stage where fire is developed, and communal living therefore becomes more convenient. Primitive communist societies tend to be very small, consisting of a maximum of a few hundred members, with size being dependent upon the environment. In this stage humanity is no different from any other animal, in that it has not yet found ways to bend nature to its will. This stage ends with the development of private property, especially with the development of large scale agriculture. This in turn produces productive property, such as cattle and slaves. [Ibid.,   (accessed).]
[10] Ibid.,   (accessed).
[11] The slave-owning class “owns" the land and slaves, which are the main means of producing wealth, whilst the vast majority has very little or nothing. The property less included the slave class, slaves who work for no money, and in most cases women, who were also dispossessed during this period. From a Marxist perspective, slave society collapsed when it exhausted itself. The need to keep conquering more slaves created huge problems, such as maintaining the vast empire that resulted (i.e. The Roman Empire). It is ultimately the aristocracy born in this epoch that demolishes it and forces society to step onto the next stage. [Ibid.,   (accessed).]
[12] Ibid.,   (accessed).
[13] Ibid.,   (accessed).
[14] Bernard Nossiter, "Getting Trough with Poor Nations," in The Development Apocalypse, ed. Stephen C. Rose and Peter Paul Van Lelyveld (New York: Youth Department, World Council of Christian Education, 1967), 32.
[15] Etim N. E. Udoh, "International Justice Today: Myth or Reality?," in The Development Apocalypse, ed. Stephen C. Rose and Peter Paul Van Lelyveld (New York: Youth Department, World Council of Christian Education, 1967), 40-41.
[16] Indukuri John Mohan Razu, Global Capitalism as Hydra (Delhi: ISPCK, 2006), 17.
[17] Ibid., 3.
[18] James Becket, "The World Economy: Short on Change," in The Development Apocalypse (0r) Will International Injustice Kill the Ecumenical Movement?, ed. Stephen C. Rose and Peter Paul Van Lelyveld (New York: Youth Department, World Council of Christian Education, 1967), 25.
[19] Andreas Kostenberger, "Economics," in Evangelical Dictionary of World Missions, ed. A. Scott Moreau, Harold Netland, and Charles Van Engen (grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2000), 297.
[20] Paul G. Hiebert, Cultural Anthropology (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1997), 299.
[21] Becket, 12-13.
[22] Becket, 11.
[23] In a country with a developing economy, where a vast majority of the people is living at a subsistence level, higher agricultural and industrial production is a prime necessity. If the standards of living of the masses are to be improved and the basic conditions of civilized existence are to be Ugured to them, higher production will have to be ensured through greater private and public investment. ["Economic Growth with Social Justice",  http://essaysandarticles.com/search/economic-justice-in-india/ (accessed 06/ 06/ 2012).]
[24] K. Rajaratnam, "A Methodology for Transformation of Rural Society," in Ecumenism: Prospects and Challenges, ed. Vinod Victor, Leslie Nathaniel, and Surya Prakash (Delhi: ISPCK, 2001), 144.
[25] Julia Fleming, "The Right Reputation and the Preferential Option for the Poor," in Studies in Christian Ethics, ed. chrysene Gudorf and Paul Lauritzen (Kotayam: Andreas-Punnoose Publishing Company, 2009), 583-84.
[26] "Definition: Economic Justice for All",  http://www.disciplesnow.com/articles/430/index.html (accessed 06/ 06/ 2012).
[27] Ibid.: 585.
[28] Jose Kuriedath, "Globalization Market Economy and Increasing Poverty," Jeevadhara XXXIX, no. 232 (July 2009): 262.
[29] Prechard B. M. Basaiawmoit, "Towards Koinonia - a True Community," in Ecumenism: Hope in Action, ed. Aruna Gnanadason (Nagpur: National Council of Churches in India, 1990), 36.
[30] Rudolf C. Heredia, "Option for the Poor and the Local Church," Vidyajyothi Journal of Theological Reflection 67, no. 7 (July 2003).
[31] Paulos Mar Gregorious, Global Peace and Common Security (Delhi: Mar Gregorios Foundation & ISPCK, 1998), 2-3.
[32] Becket, 12.
[33] O. L. Snaitang, A History of Ecumenical Movement: An Introduction (Bangalore: BTESSC/SATHRI, 2010), 217.
[34] Mathews George Chunakara, "Sustainable Development and Economic Growth in the South Amidst Negative Impact of Globalization; Challenges to the Ecumenical Movement," in Ecumenism: Prospects and Challenges, ed. Vinod Victor, Leslie Nathaniel, and P. Surya Prakash (Delhi: ISPCK, 2001), 50-51.
[35] Ibid., 13-14.
[36] "Definition: Economic Justice for All",   (accessed).
[37] William A. Haviland, Anthropology (New York: CBS college Publishing, 1985), 411.
[38] Stephen A. Grunlan and Marvin K. Mayers, Cultural Anthropology (Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1988), 107-08.
[39] James Becket, "The World Economy: Short on Change," in The Development Apocalypse (0r) Will International Injustice Kill the Ecumenical Movement?, ed. Stephen C. Rose and Peter Paul Van Lelyveld (New York: Youth Department, World Council of Christian Education, 1967), 11.
[40] Ibid., 108.
[41] Yahweh is the protector of the poor and the establisher of right for those who are oppressed. To know him is to experience Yahweh’s acts in the concrete affairs and relationship of people such as liberation the weak and helpless from suffering and humiliation. Yahweh’s special concern in to execute justice for the poor and the widow and this emphasis takes the central place in Jeremiah’s prophecy. “For among my people there are wicked men; their houses are full of fraud; as a cage is full of birds, they grow rich and grand, bloated and rancorous; their thoughts are all of evil, and they refuse to do justice; The claims of the orphan they do not put right nor do they grant justice to the poor,” (Jer. 5: 26-28). The poor are Yahweh’s own and special possession. They are the people. The divine has called into being to accord freedom to these people. Therefore, as the sovereign king of people whose existence is dependent upon God’s saving power, Yahweh Judges Israel in the light of their treatment towards the poor. [James H. Cone, "Biblical Relation and Social Existence," Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology XXVIII (October, 1974): 424-28.]
[42] Mark Aamot, "Biblical-Social-Economic-Justice" http://www.efremsmith.com/category/blog/2009/07/biblical-social-economic-justice/ (accessed 06/ 06/ 2012).
[43] Cone: 453.
[44] Jesus’ praxis is eminently social and public in character. It touches upon the structure of society and religion. The liberative nature of Jesus’ actively shows up clearly in his social relations. [Gunter Klein, "The Biblical Understanding of the Kingdom of God," Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology XXVI, no. 387-93 (October, 1972): 387.]
[45] There were neighbours and non-neighbours, pure and impure, Jews and Gentiles, men and women, and the observers of the Torah and ignorant people. Jesus established fellowship with people who were outside the camp and therefore he was accused of being a glutton, a drunkard and a friend of those outside the Law (Mat. 11: 19). [Leonardo Boff, Jesus Christ Liberator: A Critical Christology for Our Time (London: SPCK, 1987), 64.]
[46] Robert S. Samuel, Jesus Christ the Greatest Liberator (New Delhi: ISPCK, 1996), 24.
[47]Paul envisions a community that is characterized by mutual sharing and solidarity, which is of course based on the command to love sincerely. It is here that we find specific key words that refer to suffering – words that world invoke emotions and/or memories of the socioeconomic hardships and injustices they suffer from at present and in the recent past.[47] Yet they know that they are to love their enemies because God has already shown them mercy (12:1), and that they can find comfort and refuge in a community that practices love and mutuality. [Siu Fung Wu, "Practise Love and Follow Christ: The Profound Relevance of Romans to Holistic Mission," Transformation: An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies 29, no. 1 (January 2012): 64.]
[48] Ibid., 25-26.
[49] Especially in a huge country such as India, which now has a population of more limn 100 cores? Out of this total, those in the 15 to 30 age-group constitute 40 jar cents, are available for handling various tasks of development—local, regional and national. ["Economic Growth with Social Justice",   (accessed).]
[50] The Indian Economy is the world’s tenth largest economy by the nominal Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and the fourth largest economy by Purchasing Power Parity. [Felix Raj S.J., "Indian Economy at the Crossroads," Vidya Jouthi Journal of Theological 76, no. 2 (Feb. 2012): 81.]
[51] "Economic Growth with Social Justice",   (accessed).
[52] K. G Samuel, Major Religions and Evangelism (Thiruvalla: Rhema Publications), 18-19.

No comments:

Post a Comment