Friday, July 27, 2012

Reframing Ecumenical Theology (Human Rights, Racism, Womanist Concerns and EDAN)


Introduction
Ecumenical Movement aimed to brining unity moreover Ecumenical Movement also has broadened their understanding or involved to raise questions to mainstream churches concerning such a ‘worldly’ issues [racism, womanist concerns, human right and Ecumenical Disability Advocates Network (EDAN)]. This was an outcome of all the dehumanizing and elements in order to reframing ecumenical theology for the holistic vision for the solidarity or communal harmony or the wellbeing of the whole universe.
The question of human rights has been one of the WCC’s major international issues. Given the preeminence of human inherent values, “the content of human rights is openended, related to all forms of inequality and oppression against which individuals, groups or nations demand their rights.” The place of women in the Ecumenical movement was relatively insignificant at least in its early period. Even if the issue of women was raised in major ecumenical forum, it was mostly an issue of men and in the interest of a controlled council or conference.
The Christian Church has rejected outright racial prejudice from the early period of its inception. Racism both as an ideology and a movement has discriminated, segregated, alienated and oppressed people on the basis of clan, race, sex, and color or class distinction. Its inhuman, dehumanized and oppressive character has made it mandatory for the Church’s denunction. The mission of the Ecumenical Disability Advocates Network (EDAN) is to support the work of individuals, churches and church organizations concerned with issues affecting disabled people globally.
1.      Human Right
Human rights are a very significant issue which deals with human dignity and justice.[1] The WCC[2] works to defend human dignity by addressing human rights from an ethical and theological perspective. It responds to requests from churches to support their work when human dignity is threatened. This project attempts to accompany churches and strengthen their advocacy work for human rights. This requires a holistic approach where civil and political rights, economic, cultural and social rights are addressed in an integrated way.[3]
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights[4] is now recognized as a fundamental reference point for peoples around the world and provides the cornerstone of human rights work. It was adopted in 1948, as a "common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations." The World Council of Churches, through the Commission of the Churches on International Affairs, played a significant role in the drafting of the Declaration, particularly the article on the freedom of religion and religious liberty.[5]
Further development of the inter-religious dimension of rights and dignity; a focus on victims' and minority rights, impunity, and religious freedom; and providing the churches with a space in which they can discuss the relationship between justice, human rights and human dignity are project priorities. The project will work closely with another WCC project, the Global platform on theological reflection and analysis, on a study on justice and rights.[6]
The question of human rights has been one of the WCC’s major international issues. The term is derived from a universal human conviction that the human being has inherent dignity, honour and worth. These values are so vital that they required legislative codification and judicial guarantee in order to place limits of actions upon authorities at different levels.[7] The stoic teachings that all human persons share a common nature and the biblical account of God’s creation of man and women in His image were symbolic illustrations of universal understanding and common concern for human rights. Given the preeminence of human inherent values, “the content of human rights is openended, related to all forms of inequality and oppression against which individuals, groups or nations demand their rights.”[8]
The WCC has been part of the international body that prepared the draft of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1940s. For instance, Frederick Nolde, the founder-Director of the Commission of the Churches on International Affairs, was a consultant on the sections on religious liberty and freedom of conscience to the draffers of the said Universal Declaration of Human Rights from 1946 to 1948. From the beginning of its inauguration in 1948, the WCC has discussed and issued statements underlining the churches’ duties and commitments of human rights, issuing a declaration on religious liberty and bringing out abuses of human rights such as racism, torture and extra-judicial executions, to light.[9]
It is in this background that IX WCC Assembly, meeting in Porto Alegre between 13 and 23 February 2006, has adopted a statement on the UN Reform. The Assembly "urged member states to avoid politicising the composition of the new Human Rights Council and give it a status within the UN architecture that reflects the central importance of human rights as one of the three pillars of the UN system. Members of the UN Human Rights Council must demonstrate through their policies, actions and domestic and international human rights record a genuine commitment to the promotion and protection of human rights, including the economic, social and cultural rights. Being a UN member state or even a permanent member of the UN Security Council does not by itself meet this criterion."[10]
1.      Womanist Concerns
1.1.The Status of Women in Religion
The status of women in religion, though the women are born leaders and could do mighty works far beyond that of men, history has generally relegated women to a low status – a status where they are considered as emotionally unfit or traditionally shameful. They have been regarded as inferior, unequal and low in all respects. In Christianity especially the Old Testament patriarchy was itself an implicit explanation of a male-dominated society.[11] The ministry of women in the New Testament, they were among the earliest members of the New Testament Church. Though Jesus Christ[12] did not choose any woman as a disciple, he was nevertheless conceived and born through the Blessed Virgin Mary and in the line of Judah. Mary was venerated and placed on the highest level in the traditions of both the Western Church and that of the East as well. The Crucified Christ, who rose from the dead on the third day, appeared to a women first, Mary Magdalene (Mark 16:9).[13] Lydia was the founder member of the Church at Philippi (Acts 16: 11ff).[14] Most major religions, like Hinduism, Islam, and others have never given equal importance to women.[15]
1.2.The Ecumenical Concerns of Women
The history of women in the Bible, an assessment of the impact that women in the missionary movements of the 19th century have made an the lives of the people they encountered, or an objective, positive re-look at the contribution that women have made to the church and the ecumenical movement in this century-will all affirm that indeed women have been at the forefront of the missionary and evangelistic tasks of the church throughout its history. But it is also true that these contributions from women have been very inadequately recorded because women’s selfless and devoted service to the church has often been counted for nothing. In recent times, women in various parts of the world have more consistently begun affirming and putting down on record all that they have gifted to the church and to its various ministries.[16]
The place of women in the Ecumenical movement was relatively insignificant at least in its early period. With the exception of the YWCA, most of the ecumenical ventures did not have significant women representation.[17] Even if the issue of women was raised in major ecumenical forum, it was mostly an issue of men and in the interest of a controlled council or conference. The YMCA that was formed in 1854 through had provided ample opportunity to women’s freedom, responsibility and full participation in the decision making, it was nevertheless another compartmentalized organization vis-à-vis the YMCA and not a part of the larger movement at least in the recent past.[18]
The first Assembly of the WCC in Amsterdam 1948 was an international and ecumenical gathering of mostly male-delegated members. It was planned by men, discussed and decided by meetings of men for churches, missions and missionaries and implemented by men. If at all there were women participants and discussions on their question, the proceedings were designed to place them marginally in an insignificant position. It is not surprising, therefore, that even at the Edinburgh World Missionary Conference[19], 1910 the issue of the place of women in the church and in the mission field came up in the agenda. But the issue and importance of women kept coming up, and women felt that they were achieving their goal as equal partners with men, gradually. So the invitation of Kathleen Bliss to address in one of the sessions of the first WCC Assembly I 1948 was an achievement.[20] Her address on The Service and Status of Women in the Churches was published and became a source book on women’s concerns.[21] The speech was so powerful that it made the Amsterdam Assembly to set up a permanent commission on the life and work of women in the Church. Sarah Chakko too read a report on the role and status of women in the Church from 58 countries. The first half of the 20th century ecumenical movement through had not facilitated substantive women’s involvement had however created an intense awareness that had significant repercussions on the ecumenical thinking in the later years.[22]
2.      Racism
Despite the claim that in many nations a “post-racial” reality has been achieved, racism and similar instruments of discrimination continue to plague many populations throughout the world. People of African descent, the Dalits in South Asia, the indigenous peoples, the ethnic, linguistic and religious minorities in many places in the world continue to be more marginalized than before on account of the changing economic, political and social conditions that the present world has entailed. This is true even though human rights activism and liberation movements have made gains in highlighting these problems and some legislation has been enacted in an attempt to provide solutions. The legacy of discrimination and exclusionary practices persists, though sometimes in forms less obvious than in the past. The presence of these insidious forms of economic, social, cultural, and political exclusion reflects that the struggle against dehumanizing discriminatory practices continues and that our churches must assume a greater leadership role in challenging them in their old and new forms and guises.[23]
The Programme to Combat Racism (PCR) is a sub-unit II, on Justice and service. It came into existence in 1969 following the Uppsala Assembly in 1968. The Christian Church has rejected outright racial prejudice from the early period of its inception. Racism both as an ideology and a movement has discriminated, segregated, alienated and oppressed people on the basis of clan, race, sex, and color or class distinction. Its inhuman, dehumanized and oppressive character has made it mandatory for the Church’s denunction.[24]
J. H. Oldham was apparently the first ecumenical leader who had attempted to provide an articulated systematic writing against racism as early as 1924. Four years later, the issue of racism required sufficient attention as one of the major agendas of the International Missionary Council meeting in Jerusalem in 1928. The Amsterdam WCC Assembly 1948, viewed racism as “denials of justice and human dignity“ and called upon churches to fight against it, and to take serious action against racial prejudice and ovecome its barriers in society.[25]
The WCC Uppsala Assembly 1968 did not just recognize the seriousness of racism in society but also provided a concrete structural framework for  its elimination. There were at least three main factors that had prompted the Uppsala meeting to give racism an urgent focus. First, the World Conference on Church and Society, which was held in Geneva in 1966, had taken up the issue of racism and made strong recommendations to the WCC. Secondly, the rise of Christian thinkers like Martin Luther King Jr, Eduardo and the un expected assassination of King some weeks before he was to deliver a speech at the Uppasala’s Assembly in 1968 stimulated ecumenical debate and action against racism. Lastly, influence had also come from the side of the UN discussions and resolutions against racism and racial prejudice, although the Uppasala statement went a step ahead in identifying the gravity of “white racism“ in different parts of the world.[26]
3.      EDAN
The mission of the Ecumenical Disability Advocates Network (EDAN) is to support the work of individuals, churches and church organizations concerned with issues affecting disabled people globally. Created after the WCC's Eighth Assembly in Zimbabwe in 1998, the network envisaged an all-inclusive approach to ecumenical work from the very start. EDAN's main purpose, as set out in its constitution, is to advocate for the inclusion, participation, and active involvement of persons with disabilities in the spiritual, social and development life of church and society. Its goals are to maintain an active network of people with disabilities, to improve their situation by providing the space for their contributions and gifts to the ecumenical movement and the churches, and to hold up this network as a distinctive ecumenical contribution to new models of being the church.[27]
Specific operational objectives include: 1) to maintain the fellowship forged between diverse disability advocates and, where necessary, to extend it to include other interests not so far represented; 2) to engage in theological reflection on disability in order to provide a foundation for church engagement; 3) to work with and advise the WCC on its work to improve conditions affecting disabled people in the churches globally; 4) to deepen cooperation with and among churches, national ecumenical bodies and regional ecumenical organizations in respect to inclusion and full participation of people with disabilities in their ministry and mission; 5) to broaden the process of information-gathering in support of disability concerns and advocacy efforts; 6) to take initiatives that will express the willingness and capacity of disabled people to help further a disability agenda in the life of the church globally; 7) to analyze and address the relationship of disabilities to systematic violence, war, and human rights violations.[28]
EDAN organizes regional meetings in different parts of the world.[29] Participants with disabilities contribute their perspectives and challenge their churches to become inclusive of their theological and spiritual gifts. They also devise ways to strengthen and expand the network in each region.[30]
EDAN is both a movement and an institution. As a movement, it continues to develop regional networks to lobby for the inclusion of persons with disabilities in the general life of the church. At the institutional level, EDAN is part of the WCC structure. The All Africa Conference of Churches (AACC) offers a home for the EDAN coordinating office. The network is administered by Samuel Kabue, who was previously the director of the NCCK Advocacy Unit, but is now a full time WCC staff member working under the auspices of the AACC. A four-member core group - Rev. Noel Fernandez Collot (Cuba), Rev. Arne Fritzson (Sweden), Ms Ye Ja Lee (Korea), and Ms Caroline Thompson (USA) - supports and assists the consultant.[31]
Conclusion
            It is important that our today’s church and society should work hand in hand in shaping and reconstructing a new structure according to ecumenical perspective against all the barrier of this contemporary world such as, racism, womanist concerns, human right and Ecumenical Disability Advocates Network (EDAN), gender discriminations, economic marginalization and all other social injustice to the better spiritual environment and social justice.




[1] M. Stephen, Human Rights Concepts and Perspectives (New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company, 2002), 124.
[2] World Council of Churches (WCC), a fellowship that brings together 348 Protestant, Orthodox, Anglican and other Churches representing more than 560 million Christians in over 110 countries.
[3] "Human Rights to Enhance Human Dignity",  http://www.oikoumene.org/en/programmes/public-witness-addressing-power-affirming-peace/human-rights.html (accessed 01/ 07/ 2012).
[4] The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1976) and other complementary instruments and some regional documents have become the foundation stone on which the edifice of human rights is being built. Soon after the establishment of the United Nations, work on the drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights began. Its text, proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948, opens with the following words: “whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of equal and inalienable rights to all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world’.
Two generation of rights were internationally recognized after the World War. The ‘first generation’ of human rights was well established in the legislation of various countries in Europe and America by the mid-nineteenth century. They were, to a large extent, rights of certain people. These rights were not considered applicable to all races or social classes. The concept of women’s rights was largely unknown. Since those days there has been a battle to end discrimination and to extend the basic rights to everyone- workers, peasants, women, religious believers, nations, ethnic groups, indigenous populations and various ‘minorities’.
   A ‘second generation’ of rights began to be formulated together with the increasing formal recognition of civil and political rights for all. They are the economic, social and cultural rights. The right to be employed and to fair working conditions, the right to a standard of living that ensures health and well-being, the right to social security, the right to education, the right to participate in the cultural life of the community, special rights of motherhood and childhood (P, 226-227). [M. A. Thomas, Towards Wider Ecumenism (Bangalore: Asian Trading Corporation, 1993), 226-27.]
[5] Samuel Kobia, "Human Rights Council" http://www.oikoumene.org/en/resources/documents/general-secretary/messages-and-letters/human-rights-council.html (accessed 01/ 07/ 2012).
[6] "Human Rights to Enhance Human Dignity",   (accessed).
[7] "Economic Growth with Social Justice",  http://essaysandarticles.com/search/economic-justice-in-india/ (accessed 06/ 06/ 2012).
[8] O. L. Snaitang, A History of Ecumenical Movement: An Introduction (Bangalore: BTESSC/SATHRI, 2010), 212-13.
[9] Ibid., 213.
[10] Kobia,   (accessed).
[11] Snaitang, 202.
[12] Christ affirmed women’s witness and treated them with dignity, respect and honor. Women and men were equally called to the ministry of witnessing. Thus we can say that the task of witnessing Christ in the local congtrgation from a feminist perspective is to build a discipleship of equals, an inclusive community where everyone is accepted and has a place, regardless of differences. [Bethel Krupa Victor, "Witnessing to Christ Today in Local Congregation: Women in Mission," in Edinburgh 2010: Witnessing to Christ Today in India, ed. James Massey and Wati Longchar (Bangalore: FTESSC / SATHRI / SCEPTRE, 2011).]
[13] Papiya Durairaj, "Ecumenism in India Today: Women's Perspective," in Ecumenism in India Today, ed. James Massey (Bangalore: BTESSC / SATHRI, 2008), 68.
[14] Snaitang, 201.
[15] Ibid., 202.
[16] Aruna Gnanadason, "Women in the Ecumenical Movement," International Review of Mission ATLA Serials: 237.
[17] Noarola Imchen, "On Ecumenism in India Today: Women's Perspective," in Ecumenism in India Today, ed. James Massey (Bangalore: BTESSC / SATHRI, 2008), 71.
[18] Snaitang, 202-03.
[19] According to Brian Stanley, there were more than two hundred women delegates among the 1200 who gathered at Edinburgh 1910. But their voice was hardly heard. It is shocking to note that it had been the decision of the organizing committee not to appoint a separate commission to study women’s work in mission, but to “have women’s help on all of the commission.” In fact the number of women involved was very low and two of the commissions had no women members at all. [Aswathy John, "Witnessing to Christ Today in India: Women's Pespective," in Edinburgh 2010: Witnessing to Christ Today in India, ed. James Massey and Wati Longchar (Bangalore: FTESSC / SATHRI / SCEPTRE, 2011), 181.]
[20] Snaitang, 203.
[21] Gnanadason: 240.
[22] Snaitang, 203.
[23] "Statement from the Wcc Conference on Racism Today",  http://www.oikoumene.org/de/dokumentation/documents/oerk-programme/unity-mission-evangelism-and-spirituality/just-and-inclusive-communities/racism/statement-from-the-wcc-conference-on-racism-today.html (accessed 01/ o7/ 2012).
[24] Snaitang, 215.
[25] Ibid.
[26] Ibid., 215-16.
[27] "Ecumenical Disability Advocates Network (Edan)",  http://www.oikoumene.org/en/programmes/unity-mission-evangelism-and-spirituality/just-and-inclusive-communities/people-with-disabilities-edan.html (accessed 01/ 07/ 2012).
[28] Ibid.,   (accessed).
[29] The thirteen original members of the Ecumenical Disability Advocates Network (EDAN), all persons with disabilities, held their first consultation under the sponsorship of the WCC in Nairobi, Kenya in December 1999. They came from Africa (Uganda, Madagascar, D.R. Congo, Ghana and Kenya), North America (USA), Caribbean (Jamaica), Latin America (Cuba), Europe (Hungary, Netherlands, and Sweden), and Asia (Taiwan, South Korea). The purpose of the consultation was to set out parameters for furthering the disability agenda globally. As such, it was a landmark in the development of EDAN from a mere concept to an institutionalized operation.
Consultation participants said that people with disabilities have immense capacities that need to be shared to enrich the lives of God's people world-wide. God is committed to the total wellbeing of his people, and calls us to a similar commitment to enhance their satisfaction and fight against those forces that discomfort human beings. This observation is the basis for EDAN's work. At the end of the seven-day consultation, EDAN members agreed on all its operational structures, goals and objectives.
["How Edan Is Organized",  http://www.oikoumene.org/en/programmes/unity-mission-evangelism-and-spirituality/just-and-inclusive-communities/people-with-disabilities-edan/about-edan/how-edan-is-organized.html (accessed 01/ 07/ 2012).]
[30] "Ecumenical Disability Advocates Network (Edan)",   (accessed).
[31] "How Edan Is Organized",   (accessed).

No comments:

Post a Comment